BREAKING: DLA Piper Defeats Fired Associate's Claims Of Pregnancy Bias

By Pete Brush · April 13, 2026, 5:10 PM EDT

A federal jury in Manhattan declined to award damages Monday to a former associate who says DLA Piper unlawfully fired her after she announced she was pregnant, absolving the BigLaw firm...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Case Information

Case Title

Mehta v. DLA Piper LLP

Case Number

Court

New York Southern

Nature of Suit

Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act

Date Filed

June 06, 2023

Recent Articles By Pete

April 10, 2026
DLA Piper Partner Rejects Pregnant Atty's Account Of Firing
April 08, 2026
DLA Piper Offered Pregnant Atty 'Dignified' Exit, Jury Told
April 07, 2026
Pregnant DLA Piper Atty Recounts Firing: 'This Feels Wrong'
April 06, 2026
Pregnant DLA Piper Atty Fired For 'Sloppy' Work, Jury Told
March 30, 2026
Cognizant Hit With $8.4M Verdict Over NYU Prof's Firing
March 27, 2026
Fired Cognizant Worker Was 'Uncooperative,' Jury Told
March 23, 2026
Cognizant Fired Worker Over Hiring Bias Claims, Jury Told
March 13, 2026
Baldoni Atty Avoids Sanctions For Blake Lively Comments
March 10, 2026
DLA Piper Can't Rep Itself At Bias Trial, Fired Atty Says
February 23, 2026
Analyst Who Claimed She Was Fired For Needing Sleep Settles