The Federal Trade Commission’s rulemaking on non-compete agreements faces legal obstacles but could reap political and public policy benefits even if it’s struck down in court.
It’s an unusual legal story that involves international chess tournaments, the Twombly standard for pleading collusion, Arthur Schopenhauer, and radio-controlled vibrating sex devices — all at the same time. But this is such a story.
Current Issue: 891
The following article first appeared on March 14 on MLex. For more information on MLex, including getting access to its exclusive content, please contact sales@mlex.com.
The following article first appeared on March 16 on MLex. For more information on MLex, including getting access to its exclusive content, please contact sales@mlex.com.
Search engines, streaming music services, social media networks are all free to consumers. But are they really free? And how should competition agencies evaluate the impact of goods or services...
The Federal Trade Commission has been most successful when it focuses its efforts on clear harms and reserves its administrative court for clarifying emerging issues of law, the agency’s sole...
With Donald Trump holding his lead as Republican frontrunner, the possibility of a Trump administration is no longer entirely far-fetched. So what would its competition policy look like? A few...
For many presidential candidates antitrust law is an abstract subject that hasn’t had an impact on their lives.